Monday, April 20, 2026

Family Tree UK May 2026

The latest issue of Family Tree UK magazine is now available free online for Campaspe Library members via our subscription to Libby eMagazines.


Inside this month's issue : 

  • New funding for community archiving
  • AI insights, data extraction and transcriptions with ScribeAI
  • Better long-term preservation of adoption & children-in-care records
  • Clues to a million wills
  • New look website from photo expert Jayne Shrimpton
  • Preparation for 2031 Census underway
  • What’s for tea, Nan?
  • One year on: new family histories from MyStories
  • DNA Club news 
  • Explore the world’s largest Y-DNA haplotree 
  • The originals are the best 
  • Life in Ireland in the era of the 1926 Census
  • Staffordshire bound
  • The Hidden Legacy of Titanic’s Crew
  • Is it true, or are you barking up the wrong tree?
  • And more 

Sunday, April 19, 2026

Week 16 (Apr. 16-22) A Quiet Life - #52Ancestors

While it is ever so entertaining to discover amazing things our ancestors did that impacted their communities, made the news and created fascinating records, many of our ancestors lived a quiet life.

They were born, grew up, found jobs, raised their own families, and died peacefully.  They rarely, if ever, saw their names in the newspapers. They left few records behind them.  Their lives were unexceptional,

These ancestors can be challenging to trace.  Moving beyond the basic records - civil registration, censuses, church records - there can be little to find.

Context can be important.  Even if they left few records behind themselves, what events did they live through that would have impacted their lives?  Large events like wars, epidemics, major discoveries, economic and social changes.  Were they alive through industrialization, famines, women getting the right to vote?  What smaller local events would they have witnessed and possibly taken part in - agricultural fairs, church activities, local sports and committees.

Even a quiet life would have seen many events and changes - and researching them will help fill out your ancestor's life.

Wednesday, April 15, 2026

1926 Irish Census Release

The 1926 Census of Ireland will be released online for free by the National Archives of Ireland on April 18, 2026, marking 100 years since it was taken. This release will provide fully searchable, detailed records of over 700,000 households in the Irish Free State, filling a major gap in genealogical records between 1911 and modern times.
  • Access: The records will be free and fully searchable, featuring names, addresses, occupations, and Irish language proficiency.
  • Scope: Covers the 26 counties of the Irish Free State; unfortunately, Northern Ireland records from 1926 did not survive.
  • Significance: It is the first major census release since 1911, offering a detailed snapshot of Irish society shortly after independence.
  • Context: The release is accompanied by a public program including a documentary, exhibitions, and a book examining the 1926 revealing a diverse population.


Week 15 (Apr. 9-15) Unexpected - #52Ancestors

Finding a genealogical surprise, be it good or bad, I always find an exciting experience.  If I have learned anything in my research, it is to expect the unexpected.  Over the years of my research I have found many surprises in my research - unexpected records and breakthroughs, family stories proven (or disproved), surprising events, etc.

Many of my most unexpected discoveries have come through the newspapers.  Reports of family tragedies, court appearances, advertisements, activities and family notices, all provided unexpected family discoveries.

Some highlights include :

A 1909 report of my great grandfather Edward Beseler when he appeared in court on the charge of having insufficient means of support, was found to be insane and an order of commitment was made.

From the Ballarat Star, 4 February 1909


Edward was admitted to the Ararat Mental Asylum, where he was assessed, found to be suffering from senility, and committed to the wards.  In his asylum record he is described at the time of his admission as being in fair bodily health for his age, clean and tidy but difficult to communicate with as he was quite deaf, illiterate and described as suffering from delusions.

Then there was the divorce of another great grandfather James Nicholas Clark from his first wife Eliza (Hawley)


The marriage was clearly an unhappy one, and in 1891 Eliza had abandoned James and their two young children.  In the divorce proceedings it had been claimed that Eliza had been a habitual drunkard and had been living with two men after she abandoned her marriage, although the judge saw no direct evidence of adultery and granted the divorce on the grounds of desertion only.  The divorce was reported in the local newspapers amongst general reports of local court proceedings, including the article shown above from the 'Caulfield and Elsternwick Leader'.

When James Nicholas passed away in 1924 there were two death notices inserted in the newspaper - one from his family and one from the Masonic Lodge of which he was a member. 


Had it not been for this Masonic notice, I would never have known that James was a Mason.  It is also worth noting the spelling error - the heading of the Masonic notice has CLARG, not CLARK.  The family notice also gives me his occupation - Overseer at Brighton City Council, and both notices give his address and the cemetery in which his grave is located.

Estate and probate notices were common, either advertising to resolve claims and demands on the estate or giving details of the sale of assets.  Here Susannah, the widow of Mr John Noble, advertises in the Essex Standard on Friday 4 October 1850 to resolve her husband's estate.
 

These and many other newspaper surprises have helped 'flesh out' my family history research and fill in details of my ancestors unexpected lives.

Monday, April 6, 2026

Week 14 (Apr. 2-8) A Brick Wall Revisited - #52Ancestors

It is important to remember with our brick walls exactly what 'I couldn't find anything' actually means.  It doesn't mean 'there is nothing to find'.  What it really means is 'I didn't find the information I was looking for in the place I was looking for it, using the search parameters I was using'.  It is an important distinction to make.

Consider the source you’re using.  Was it a database or an index? Not finding someone in an index is different than not finding it in the records themselves.  Look at the source – is it complete, or are there gaps, missing years that could cover the time you are looking for?  Some records haven’t survived in complete form.  Is it transcribed?  Could there be spelling errors in the transcription – or in the original records themselves?  For those times when the record you’re looking for doesn’t exist — either your ancestor isn’t in the record or the record was destroyed — think about other records that could give you the same - or similar - information.

If you’re in an online database, will it search variations in spelling or do you need to do multiple searches to find both “Smith” and “Smythe”? What about Mc and Mac?  Play with your search terms – sometimes less is more.  You could also consider not searching - start browsing. You never know what you might find hidden by a spelling error or some other small difference.

New records are being released, digitised or transcribed all the time, and we are (hopefully) learning new search techniques and becoming more skilled researchers as well.  That's why it is important to revisit our brick walls.  There might be new information sources available.  There might be new search methods we have learned over time.  We may have new information on the individual or family that makes breaking down our brick wall possible.

Not finding anything isn’t necessarily the end.  Think about other sources, other search strategies, and other ways of using those records. Don’t let not finding something add a brick to that brick wall.

Friday, April 3, 2026

Who Do You Think You Are April 2026

The latest issue of Who Do You Think You Are magazine is now available free online for Campaspe Library members via our subscription to Libby eMagazines.

Inside this month's issue :  

  • Countdown begins to 1926 Irish census release
  • Irish GRO provides update on missing death records
  • Refugee architects database now live
  • Scots emigrants website goes online
  • Medieval child marriage
  • A footballer went to war 
  • Three essential websites
  • A Post Office under pressure
  • Websites for WW1 research
  • Illegitimacy Records from the 19th Century
  • Edwin Chadwick 1800–1890 
  • Unmissable websites
  • Old maps online
  • Irish Land Commission Records
  • And more...

Friday, March 27, 2026

Week 13 (Mar. 26-Apr. 1) A Family Pattern - #52Ancestors

Every family has their popular names - names that appear generation after generation regardless of fashion, forming a family pattern.  There were, of course, always fads among names - copying that of the current Monarch and their family, for example, as well as using a traditional name common amongst ancestors.

Family naming patterns were frequent in many families, although they are by no means a reliable way of predicting the names of children.  Traditionally, the first son would be named for the paternal grandfather, the second son for the maternal grandfather and the third son for the father.  For females, the first daughter would be named for the maternal grandmother, the second daughter for the paternal grandmother and the third daughter for the mother.  Providing, of course, these names were not the same.  

Then, there are the families that seemed to delight in using unusual names for their children, and those who followed popular fads.  Horatio, for example, made a brief surge in popularity after Nelson's victory at Trafalgar.  Similarly, Adolf disappeared from German communities after World War 2.

In the 1700s the top five names for each gender were :
Boys - John, William, Thomas, Richard and James
Girls - Mary, Elizabeth, Ann, Sarah and Jane

In the 1800s the top five names for each gender were :
Boys - John, William, James, George and Charles
Girls - Mary, Anna, Emma, Elizabeth and Margaret

There was also the tendency, unusual as it may seem to us today, of reusing the name of a child who had died.  In the 1700's and 1800's this occurs frequently in my family tree, with the name of a child who has died in infancy being reused for the next child of the same gender born to the family.  

This can make research quite tricky, especially when a popular name has been used by several branches of a family.  In my Irish Mulholland family, for example, four brothers all named their first son James, after their father.  One child died at 2 days old and the name was reused 18 months later.  This meant there were five children named James Mulholland, born within five years and a few miles of each other.  Sorting out which records belong with which child is quite a challenge.

Then two of them married women named Mary.