Monday, April 20, 2026

Family Tree UK May 2026

The latest issue of Family Tree UK magazine is now available free online for Campaspe Library members via our subscription to Libby eMagazines.


Inside this month's issue : 

  • New funding for community archiving
  • AI insights, data extraction and transcriptions with ScribeAI
  • Better long-term preservation of adoption & children-in-care records
  • Clues to a million wills
  • New look website from photo expert Jayne Shrimpton
  • Preparation for 2031 Census underway
  • What’s for tea, Nan?
  • One year on: new family histories from MyStories
  • DNA Club news 
  • Explore the world’s largest Y-DNA haplotree 
  • The originals are the best 
  • Life in Ireland in the era of the 1926 Census
  • Staffordshire bound
  • The Hidden Legacy of Titanic’s Crew
  • Is it true, or are you barking up the wrong tree?
  • And more 

Sunday, April 19, 2026

Week 16 (Apr. 16-22) A Quiet Life - #52Ancestors

While it is ever so entertaining to discover amazing things our ancestors did that impacted their communities, made the news and created fascinating records, many of our ancestors lived a quiet life.

They were born, grew up, found jobs, raised their own families, and died peacefully.  They rarely, if ever, saw their names in the newspapers. They left few records behind them.  Their lives were unexceptional,

These ancestors can be challenging to trace.  Moving beyond the basic records - civil registration, censuses, church records - there can be little to find.

Context can be important.  Even if they left few records behind themselves, what events did they live through that would have impacted their lives?  Large events like wars, epidemics, major discoveries, economic and social changes.  Were they alive through industrialization, famines, women getting the right to vote?  What smaller local events would they have witnessed and possibly taken part in - agricultural fairs, church activities, local sports and committees.

Even a quiet life would have seen many events and changes - and researching them will help fill out your ancestor's life.

Wednesday, April 15, 2026

1926 Irish Census Release

The 1926 Census of Ireland will be released online for free by the National Archives of Ireland on April 18, 2026, marking 100 years since it was taken. This release will provide fully searchable, detailed records of over 700,000 households in the Irish Free State, filling a major gap in genealogical records between 1911 and modern times.
  • Access: The records will be free and fully searchable, featuring names, addresses, occupations, and Irish language proficiency.
  • Scope: Covers the 26 counties of the Irish Free State; unfortunately, Northern Ireland records from 1926 did not survive.
  • Significance: It is the first major census release since 1911, offering a detailed snapshot of Irish society shortly after independence.
  • Context: The release is accompanied by a public program including a documentary, exhibitions, and a book examining the 1926 revealing a diverse population.


Week 15 (Apr. 9-15) Unexpected - #52Ancestors

Finding a genealogical surprise, be it good or bad, I always find an exciting experience.  If I have learned anything in my research, it is to expect the unexpected.  Over the years of my research I have found many surprises in my research - unexpected records and breakthroughs, family stories proven (or disproved), surprising events, etc.

Many of my most unexpected discoveries have come through the newspapers.  Reports of family tragedies, court appearances, advertisements, activities and family notices, all provided unexpected family discoveries.

Some highlights include :

A 1909 report of my great grandfather Edward Beseler when he appeared in court on the charge of having insufficient means of support, was found to be insane and an order of commitment was made.

From the Ballarat Star, 4 February 1909


Edward was admitted to the Ararat Mental Asylum, where he was assessed, found to be suffering from senility, and committed to the wards.  In his asylum record he is described at the time of his admission as being in fair bodily health for his age, clean and tidy but difficult to communicate with as he was quite deaf, illiterate and described as suffering from delusions.

Then there was the divorce of another great grandfather James Nicholas Clark from his first wife Eliza (Hawley)


The marriage was clearly an unhappy one, and in 1891 Eliza had abandoned James and their two young children.  In the divorce proceedings it had been claimed that Eliza had been a habitual drunkard and had been living with two men after she abandoned her marriage, although the judge saw no direct evidence of adultery and granted the divorce on the grounds of desertion only.  The divorce was reported in the local newspapers amongst general reports of local court proceedings, including the article shown above from the 'Caulfield and Elsternwick Leader'.

When James Nicholas passed away in 1924 there were two death notices inserted in the newspaper - one from his family and one from the Masonic Lodge of which he was a member. 


Had it not been for this Masonic notice, I would never have known that James was a Mason.  It is also worth noting the spelling error - the heading of the Masonic notice has CLARG, not CLARK.  The family notice also gives me his occupation - Overseer at Brighton City Council, and both notices give his address and the cemetery in which his grave is located.

Estate and probate notices were common, either advertising to resolve claims and demands on the estate or giving details of the sale of assets.  Here Susannah, the widow of Mr John Noble, advertises in the Essex Standard on Friday 4 October 1850 to resolve her husband's estate.
 

These and many other newspaper surprises have helped 'flesh out' my family history research and fill in details of my ancestors unexpected lives.

Monday, April 6, 2026

Week 14 (Apr. 2-8) A Brick Wall Revisited - #52Ancestors

It is important to remember with our brick walls exactly what 'I couldn't find anything' actually means.  It doesn't mean 'there is nothing to find'.  What it really means is 'I didn't find the information I was looking for in the place I was looking for it, using the search parameters I was using'.  It is an important distinction to make.

Consider the source you’re using.  Was it a database or an index? Not finding someone in an index is different than not finding it in the records themselves.  Look at the source – is it complete, or are there gaps, missing years that could cover the time you are looking for?  Some records haven’t survived in complete form.  Is it transcribed?  Could there be spelling errors in the transcription – or in the original records themselves?  For those times when the record you’re looking for doesn’t exist — either your ancestor isn’t in the record or the record was destroyed — think about other records that could give you the same - or similar - information.

If you’re in an online database, will it search variations in spelling or do you need to do multiple searches to find both “Smith” and “Smythe”? What about Mc and Mac?  Play with your search terms – sometimes less is more.  You could also consider not searching - start browsing. You never know what you might find hidden by a spelling error or some other small difference.

New records are being released, digitised or transcribed all the time, and we are (hopefully) learning new search techniques and becoming more skilled researchers as well.  That's why it is important to revisit our brick walls.  There might be new information sources available.  There might be new search methods we have learned over time.  We may have new information on the individual or family that makes breaking down our brick wall possible.

Not finding anything isn’t necessarily the end.  Think about other sources, other search strategies, and other ways of using those records. Don’t let not finding something add a brick to that brick wall.

Friday, April 3, 2026

Who Do You Think You Are April 2026

The latest issue of Who Do You Think You Are magazine is now available free online for Campaspe Library members via our subscription to Libby eMagazines.

Inside this month's issue :  

  • Countdown begins to 1926 Irish census release
  • Irish GRO provides update on missing death records
  • Refugee architects database now live
  • Scots emigrants website goes online
  • Medieval child marriage
  • A footballer went to war 
  • Three essential websites
  • A Post Office under pressure
  • Websites for WW1 research
  • Illegitimacy Records from the 19th Century
  • Edwin Chadwick 1800–1890 
  • Unmissable websites
  • Old maps online
  • Irish Land Commission Records
  • And more...

Friday, March 27, 2026

Week 13 (Mar. 26-Apr. 1) A Family Pattern - #52Ancestors

Every family has their popular names - names that appear generation after generation regardless of fashion, forming a family pattern.  There were, of course, always fads among names - copying that of the current Monarch and their family, for example, as well as using a traditional name common amongst ancestors.

Family naming patterns were frequent in many families, although they are by no means a reliable way of predicting the names of children.  Traditionally, the first son would be named for the paternal grandfather, the second son for the maternal grandfather and the third son for the father.  For females, the first daughter would be named for the maternal grandmother, the second daughter for the paternal grandmother and the third daughter for the mother.  Providing, of course, these names were not the same.  

Then, there are the families that seemed to delight in using unusual names for their children, and those who followed popular fads.  Horatio, for example, made a brief surge in popularity after Nelson's victory at Trafalgar.  Similarly, Adolf disappeared from German communities after World War 2.

In the 1700s the top five names for each gender were :
Boys - John, William, Thomas, Richard and James
Girls - Mary, Elizabeth, Ann, Sarah and Jane

In the 1800s the top five names for each gender were :
Boys - John, William, James, George and Charles
Girls - Mary, Anna, Emma, Elizabeth and Margaret

There was also the tendency, unusual as it may seem to us today, of reusing the name of a child who had died.  In the 1700's and 1800's this occurs frequently in my family tree, with the name of a child who has died in infancy being reused for the next child of the same gender born to the family.  

This can make research quite tricky, especially when a popular name has been used by several branches of a family.  In my Irish Mulholland family, for example, four brothers all named their first son James, after their father.  One child died at 2 days old and the name was reused 18 months later.  This meant there were five children named James Mulholland, born within five years and a few miles of each other.  Sorting out which records belong with which child is quite a challenge.

Then two of them married women named Mary.

Friday, March 20, 2026

Week 12 (Mar. 19-25) An Address with a Story - #52Ancestors

My father's family had strong ties to Fordham Hall (also called Manor Farm) in Essex, being tennants at the Hall for several generations.  Although they were not the owners, they were major local landholders and were the gentry of their small community.

Fordham Hall, Essex

The Green family of Fordham Hall farmed the land, kept a pack of foxhounds,and took part in many community events.  The article below, from the 'Essex Standard' on Friday 13 October 1837, mentions Isaac Green of Fordham as one of the judges at the annual meeting of the local Agricultural Society.

The wedding of Constance Green, daughter of Walter Proctor Green, in 1909 was a major event at Fordham Hall, with a large party attending and the event extensively reported in the local newspapers.  Below is a photograph of the wedding party, taken on the lawn at the rear of the Hall.

Fordham Hall eventually became part of the Woodland Trust, but for years it was 'home sweet home' to my father's family.  This address holds a number of stories that form part of my father's family history.

Tuesday, March 17, 2026

Family Tree UK April 2026

The latest issue of Family Tree UK magazine is now available free online for Campaspe Library members via our subscription to Libby eMagazines.


Inside this month's issue : 

  • TNA response to MOD service record request enquiries
  • Map Explorer: now includes 25 inch & LiDAR mapping
  • Vivid Pix wins Digital Health Award
  • ‘A family history of…’: new podcast from Findmypast 
  • Website charts Scots’ journey to New Jersey in the 1680s
  • New video guide: Researching Ulster ancestors after 1800
  • New-look SoG website
  • DNA Club news 
  • 1,000-year-old astrolabe
  • Wrap-around family history publishing services 
  • Some of our censuses are missing
  • Elizabeth Hyett - shop-keeper, dealer in clothes, wet-nurse and mother
  • Inside the Titanic's Lost Workforce
  • The evolution of the Irish Free State
  • Working with your DNA match list
  • And more... 



Friday, March 13, 2026

Week 11 (Mar. 12-18) A Turning Point - #52Ancestors

Turning points come about in many ways as we research our family history.  Sometimes it is a breakthrough when new information comes to hand.  Sometimes it is when we revisit our research and uncover a mistake made long ago.  Sometimes it is when we learn new research tricks and methods.  Sometimes it is when fellow researchers reach out a hand to provide help or just a fresh set of eyes.

For some time I had been researching a family history mystery - the fate of my great aunt Alice May Pummeroy.

According to the Victorian Birth Index, Alice May Pummeroy was born in Carlton in 1897 to Alfred Henry Pummeroy and Eliza (Beseler).  Alice was only 3 years old when her father died of pneumonia, leaving his widow destitute with 4 young children -  Edith Margaret (who was a deaf-mute) 4, Alice May 3, Alfred Edward 2 and William Henry 4 months. 
 
After years of struggle Eliza remarried in 1911 to Edward Jennion, with whom she had two more boys, Edwin and Daniel.   All the other siblings can be traced through electoral rolls and other records, but Alice disappears, and for several years I searched for her in vain.

Then came the turning point.  In New Zealand, I found a record for a May Alice Pummeroy marrying David James Moorhead in 1918.  Looking in New Zealand for May Moorhead, I located several electoral roll listings before she disappeared again, reappearing in Australia as May Alice Moorhead in electoral rolls from 1950 to 1980.  David James Moorhead is recorded as dying in Victoria in 1951, age 77.  His death certificate lists him as being born in Christchurch, New Zealand.

The final turning point came with the help of a fellow genealogist who sent me another piece to the puzzle, with a death notice and cemetery record which shows May Alice Moorhead died 1st September 1989, age 92, in Salisbury North, South Australia.  She was cremated at Enfield Memorial Park, SA.

Why she chose to move from Melbourne, Victoria to South Australia I don't know - possibly she had children who settled there and she moved to be closer to them.  All her siblings lived and died in Victoria - she was the one who travelled away.  This just goes to show that people can change their names, move to places you don't expect, and you just need to keep looking and broaden your search if you don't find them where you expect them.  Eventually a turning point in your research will come.

Saturday, March 7, 2026

Week 10 (Mar. 5-11) Changed My Thinking - #52Ancestors

So often the details of our family history that we discover change our thinking - about our family, about our lives, about history, about the world we live in.  So many events and details have changed my thinking along my family history journey.

From discovering the fate of orphaned children to witnessing the determination of a newly widowed mother, from discovering a family's immigration tale to reading the World War 1 dossier of a soldier, there is always something new to learn and consider.  I have uncovered tales of divorce, disaster and desperation.  There are also stories of happier times - of social gatherings and sporting achievements, of education and career success, of marriages and growing families.

Family History opened my eyes to how life was lived by my ancestors - where they lived, their occupations, what life was like for them, how hard life was for many.  It all changed my thinking and made history so much more 'real'.

Thursday, March 5, 2026

RootTech 2026

RootsTech 2026 is about to begin!   From DNA to the power of family stories and advanced research techniques —RootsTech has sessions on nearly every topic.
The online event includes :

  • 200+ new online sessions in over 26 languages
  • Join keynote sessions live from the comfort of your own home
  • Chat online with other attendees worldwide
Many of the online sessions are presented live, with recordings available for approximately 3 years afterwards.  You can even create your own playlists so you don't miss any of the sessions that interest you.

You can search the schedule and build your own playlist of the sessions you want to view, making sure you don't miss out on anything.  Remember, recordings of the online sessions remain available after the event, so you can view all you want at your leisure.  And it is all free!

Tuesday, March 3, 2026

Ancestry opens records for International Womens Day

Over four billion family history records, including census and military records, will be free to access on Ancestry to mark International Women’s Day.

In a statement Ancestry said: “International Women’s Day is a time to not only celebrate the achievements of women today but to reflect on the progress made by the women who came before us. Many of the incredible stories of women from history are hard to find because historical documents sometimes exclude women’s occupations, and newspapers often recorded women under their husbands’ names; but our research shows that people have a deep desire to learn about their women ancestors.”

Ancestry is offering free access to 59 record sets from 8 to 18 March.

Key free record sets include:

  • The 1881, 1911 and 1921 English and Welsh census records
  • The 1939 Register for England and Wales
  • Over two million 1833-1956 UK rail employee records
  • The 1737-1969 UK postal service appointment books
  • The 1898-1968 UK and Ireland nursing registers
  • The 1904-59 UK midwives roll
  • The 1914-23 UK First World War pension ledgers and index cards
  • The Second World War Women’s Land Army index cards
  • The First World War Women’s Army Auxiliary Corps service records
  • The First World War Women’s Royal Air Force service records
  • The First World War Women’s Royal Naval Officers’ service records
  • The England and Wales civil registration marriage indexes for 1837-1915 and 1916-2005
  • The England and Wales civil birth indexes for 1837-1915 and 1916-2007
  • The England and Wales civil death index for 1837-1915

Ancestry will also offer free access to its Newspapers.com historic newspaper website.

 

Saturday, February 28, 2026

Week 9 (Feb. 26-Mar. 4) Conflicting Clues - #52Ancestors

So often during our family history research we uncover conflicting clues. Stories that don't add up, records that don't match, timelines that prove impossible, hints that are incorrect.  Any new piece of information needs to be checked and confirmed.  Mistakes WILL be made - by researchers, by transcribers and digitizing projects, even by those who originally created records, and they can lead us badly astray in our research and waste valuable research time trying to untangle the conflicting clues.

In an earlier post I listed some of the things to keep in mind to help spot obvious errors and conflicting clues - and I have seen all of these in records and online trees : 

  • Children cannot be born before their parents. 
  • Children cannot be born to a mother who is 6 years old.  Or 94 years old.  
  • Children are highly unlikely to be born to a father who is 89 years old.  While this MAY be biologically possible, it is unlikely and deserves a bit of fact checking. 
  • A child cannot be christened 2 months before they are born. 
  • A woman cannot marry 3 years after she has died. 
  • A man cannot enlist in the army 5 years after he has died.

Recently I discovered a transcribed record in an online database that illustrated the conflicts that can occur.  The record for the baptism of Hannah May below leapt out at me when I first located it.  Why??  Check the birth and baptism dates again.  According to this record Hannah was born 17 August 1796 but baptised 6 weeks earlier on 9 July 1796.

Something has been transcribed incorrectly in this record.  Possibly the dates are transposed and Hannah was born in July and baptised in August.  Possibly one of the months was transcribed incorrectly.  With no original image to check, I will need to dig further to find out.  It is clear, however, that a mistake has been made somewhere and has not been picked up in the transcription process.  Another conflicting clue.

Tuesday, February 24, 2026

Family Tree US Magazine March/April 2026

The latest issue of Family Tree US magazine is now available free online for Campaspe Library members via our subscription to Libby eMagazines. 

Inside this month's issue : 

  • Web Highlight: RootsTech at Home
  • Take your research to the next level!
  • AI and Ancestry.com
  • MyHeritage Adds Languages Support, DNA Traits
  • Old Ancestors, New Tools
  • Talkin’ ‘Bout a Revolution
  • Digital photo frenzy
  • Form-Fitting : Record your research 
  • Find Your U.S. Ancestors
  • Site Savoir Faire : Say bonjour to French ancestors 
  • The Secret Garden : the history of Castle Garden
  • Institutional Records
  • Finding Swedish Records at ArkivDigital 
  • Preserving Religious Artifacts
  • Finding Irish Censuses Online
  • FamilySearch : Searching Records, Building a Family Tree, & More
  • And more... 


Monday, February 23, 2026

Who Do You Think You Are Magazine March 2026

The latest issue of Who Do You Think You Are magazine is now available free online for Campaspe Library members via our subscription to Libby eMagazines.

Inside this month's issue : 

  • Stoking memories
  • RootsTech full online schedule announced
  • ‘Extremely rare’ 16th-century Devon map preserved
  • Museum buys Oliver Cromwell's watch
  • Bona Vacantia back online
  • Theresienstadt Ghetto drawings donated to the Wiener Holocaust Library
  • Moving Moments : changing address
  • Parich Registers online
  • Capturing the voices of the past 
  • The Gwent Levels
  • A hero, a cad and a scoundrel 
  • Children's workhouses
  • British Army in WW2
  • Window-Tax Records 
  • Make the most of your research on Findmypast
  • Ring in the new : the first telephone call
  • And more... 

 


Friday, February 20, 2026

Week 8 (Feb. 19-25) A Big Decision - #52Ancestors

"A Big Decision" made by several of my ancestors was to emigrate to Australia.  What was that journey like for them?  What prompted these families, mostly with young children in tow, to pack up and move halfway around the world?  Two of my immigrant families would settle in one state of Australia, then pack up and move again several years later.  What prompted them to take that leap of faith and travel so far from their homelands, families and friends?  It would have been a huge decision to make.

My immigrant ancestors came from England, Ireland and Germany.  Land in their homelands would have been difficult and costly to acquire, so the prospect of cheap land for farming may have been a big motivator for them.  Many Germans also emigrated for freedom from religious persecution.  Then there are my Irish ancestors, who left Ireland a few years before the potato famine.  Again, I suspect Australia represented the chance for a better life, a chance to own land and improve the family's living conditions.

My great grandfather, James Nicholas Clark, was born in Bristol, England or possibly Launceston, Tasmania around 1856, just as the family emigrated to Australia.  James’s younger sister Annie Amelia Clark was born 31 March 1857 in Port Sorrell, Tasmania, where the family lived for at least 12 years before they traveled across Bass Strait and settled in Victoria.

Carl Friedrich Beseler, known in Australia as Frederick, was born around 1810 in Hanover, Germany.  He was a shoemaker in Germany and a farmer in Australia, arriving in Adelaide on 1 April 1848 on the ship Pauline from Bremen, Germany.  Passengers listed were Frederick Beseler, Shoemaker, Mrs Beseler and 5 children.  The family lived in South Australia for 7 years before travelling overland to Victoria, where they settled near Ercildown.  Several members of the family are buried in Learmonth Cemetery. 

Travel by ship in the mid 1800s from Europe to Australia would have been a long and arduous journey for these families.  Their determination to forge new lives prompted them to travel such distances.  A big decision indeed.


Thursday, February 19, 2026

Family Tree UK Magazine

The latest issue of Family Tree UK magazine is now available free online for Campaspe Library members via our subscription to Libby eMagazines.


Inside this month's issue : 

  • Suffragette’s chief nurse long-lost medal on display
  • New fees introduced at The National Archives, Kew 
  • DNA Club news 
  • Bona Vacantia reinstated 
  • View the RootsTech 2026 class preview
  • Back to basics : making the most of the record sets
  • Confirmation bias in theory
  • Case to prove : George Grindle 
  • Faithfully restored : The Dudden Hill School War Memorial project 
  • How to trace a Regiment
  • The life of Bryan : a Family Perspective 
  • Your views on DNA testing
  • Which branch of the Houstouns went to Ulster?
  • And more... 

 


Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Relatives at RootsTech

RootsTech 2026 by FamilySearch has opened Relatives at RootsTech, its popular annual online family discovery activity. Hundreds of thousands of people are expected to participate globally, with the aim of making new cousin connections. Available through the end of March 2026, anyone can join the experience for free at FamilySearch.org/Connect.

The interactive discovery feature is offered annually as part of the RootsTech conference and enables participants to find and connect with living relatives. Millions have participated since the activity’s inception and have enjoyed how it can strengthen family connections and lead to new discoveries. In 2025, participants discovered nearly 5 million ancestral relationships. 

To join Relatives at RootsTech 2026 online:

  • Go to FamilySearch.org/Connect
  • If you don't have a free FamilySearch account, create one when prompted. 
  • Add what you know to the FamilySearch Family Tree. The more relatives you have in your family tree, the greater the probability that cousin connections will be made. 

The feature’s discovery technology will immediately begin using FamilySearch Family Tree information to search for and match any common ancestors with related participants worldwide and show how you are related. If desired, newly connected relatives can message each other through the website. Participants can also see how many relatives have joined the experience and filter them based on location, common ancestor, or family line.

The interactive experience will be available through 31 March 2026. 

Friday, February 13, 2026

Week 7 (Feb. 12-18) What the Census Suggests - #52Ancestors

How accurate are the census records? I'm sure this question has arisen for every genealogist at some point in their research.  We quickly learn that census records cannot be considered the absolute and final authority.  What the census suggests may not be accurate.

Why does someone's age change every census by less (or more!) than the 10 years between censuses? Why is a surname being spelled differently on three different censuses? Why does an ancestor have a different first name in the 1861 census (is it even the right person)?  And why does the census give a different place of birth for great grandma each time?

Consider first what question was actually asked by the census taker. For example with ages - did he ask about how old the person was, or how old they were on their last birthday or.....?  Were the ages of all the adults in an area rounded up (or down) to the closest multiple of five (yes, it happened)?  People may have lied about their ages, or sometimes simply got it wrong. My grandmother always insisted she was born on 30 June 1906.  According to her birth registration, however, she was born on 30 June 1905.

Remember spelling was not exact back in the 1800s and earlier. A census taker wrote what he heard, and whether or not he was a good speller or was familiar with the surname dictated what we see recorded on the census page. You get what I will grumpily refer to as 'some semi-literate clerk's best guess".  Keep in mind that it was not necessarily your ancestor who filled in the census themselves.

Different first names? Children were usually given at least two names at birth and an individual might choose to be known by their middle name, or perhaps a nickname. My ancestor Elizabeth Green (nee May) was always known as Betsy - and that is the name recorded in several censuses.

The next question we need to ask ourselves is - who provided the answers on that census? Was it a parent? Mothers may have had a better idea of their children's birth years and ages than the father. Was it an older child (perhaps the parents were not home), a grandparent or some other person giving the information? Tracing a family through several censuses may have seen a different respondent each time.  All these factors will affect the quality of the census information.

As with many other genealogical records, the census records can contain inaccurate information, mistakes and even outright lies.  What the census suggests is not always the truth.